The Deathly Hallows Film

Discuss anything and everything about the future DH film. To kick start, here's some big news from Leaky:

Quote :

Big News everyone! The L.A Times is reporting an exclusive today: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows will be made in two films, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1" , and "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part II. Furthermore, the paper cites producer David Heyman confirming the return of David Yates as director for both films, with Steven Kloves to finish out his duties as screenwriter for both Harry Potter movies as well. The movies are to be filmed at the same time, and will be released several months apart, with Part One due November 2010, and Part Two, May 2011.

Update: The article has additional information now, with quotes from producer David Heyman on his conversation with Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling on splitting the book into two films. "Heyman said he approached Rowling with some trepidation about the strategy but found that she signed off on its logic rather quickly. "I went to Jo and she was cool with it," Heyman said, "and that was quite a relief."

The newspaper continues saying "Producer David Heyman said the decision was made with some anxiety and only after considerable deliberations. The producer joked that "while my wife and Warner Brothers were pleased" to hear that the Potter movie magic will continue into the next decade, he himself fretted that the cynical observers would see the decision as a purely mercenary move."I swear to you it was born out of purely creative reasons," Heyman said during an interview in a converted airplane factory outside London that has been home base to all of the "Potter" productions. "Unlike every other book, you cannot remove elements of this book. You can remove scenes of Ron playing quidditch from the fifth book, and you can remove Hermione and S.P.E.W. [Society for the Promotion of Elfish Welfare] and those subplots . . . but with the seventh, that can't be done."

Actor Dan Radcliffe who portrays Harry Potter in the film is quoted as saying "I think it's the only way you can do it without cutting out a huge portion of the book," Radcliffe said recently during a break on the set of "Half-Blood Prince," the sixth "Potter" film, which is due in theaters on Nov. 21. "There have been compartmentalized subplots in the other books that have made them easier to cut - although those cuts were still to the horror of some fans- but the seventh book doesn't really have any subplots. It's one driving, pounding story from the word go."

Of interest to many fans is the spot in the book where the films will break, and producer David Heyman addresses this as he notes: "The question will be, where do you break it? And how do you make them one but two separate and distinct stories? Do you break it with a moment of suspense or one of resolution? These are the interesting challenges. But each book has presented its challenges."

Warner Bros. Chairman Alan Horn and Jeff Robinov, president of Warner Bros. Pictures Group, are expected to discuss the new plans for "Potter" on Thursday during a presentation at ShoWest, the convention of movie exhibitors in Las Vegas.

I think the space between the films is a bit long, but I'm glad they don't want to cut too much out!

I am thrilled they are splitting it. This rumor has been out for a while though. I agree with Amy though. I think it would be better if they made one long movie cut into two parts with an intermission.

Noo thats to long!!!!!! It would kill us, waiting to know how it will end!

Read the book the Lesley, you'd know what happens. I agree with the whole splitting thing. They cut out half the book on the other films!

I have. But im a geek for the movies too. I hate when they leave stuff out. I cried watching the 5th movie in theaters because it was nothing like the book and they gave Neville credit for Dobby's work

I wonder if they will end the the first part with ron leaving?

They should becuase thats half the book and would make them want to see it more. But that would be evil.

I don't mind that they're splitting it into two, but the release dates are waaaaay to far apart in my opinion!

i am happy they are spiting it. because it was a good book and the WHOLE thing needs to be told in movie.

yeah, i like that but having the release dates 6 MONTHS apart is too much for me

Im still saying they should stop the firs half with Ron walking out. Leave peolpe wanting to know what happen without Ron, if they havent read the book I mean

I think they could take it in two directions: a cliffhangery ending (like Ron leaving), or a sense-of-peace-and-imminent-danger ending, such as Shell Cottage.

I'm not sure what I'd prefer...

I think the Ron leaving ending would keep everyone wanting more, and although it'd be a cliffie, I think that's where the first part should end

I said that to. it would be a good spot to end it.

It really would, it would make us be more excited for the second part

It will be good for a bit of suspence to be built up in our lives....I'd make mine a bit more interesting anyway...lol

LucyXX

I have thought =this though alt,
i think they should put it in one big long movie like 10 hours i would actually sit and watch it all the way through too
lol